Opinion: COP24: here’s what must be agreed to keep warming at 1.5C

Iceberg near body of water      
            Credit:  Alto Crew on Unsplash

Iceberg near body of water Credit: Alto Crew on Unsplash

As the COP24climate summit begins in Poland, Hugh Hunt from Cambridge’s Department of Engineering outlines just what it will take to limit global warming to 1.5C, as outlined in the 2015 Paris Agreement.

The Paris Agreement of 2015 has a central aim to keep global temperature rise this century well below 2C above pre-industrial levels and to "pursue efforts" to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5C. This is an ambitious aim - global temperatures are rapidly approaching the 1.5C target and the 2C limit is not far away.

The path to 1.5C requires that the world achieve zero emissions before 2050. It is imperative, therefore, that we stop burning fossil fuels, known as mitigation. However, our present trajectory suggests we’re not on track. COP24 can’t take its eye off this ball - there is no long-term plan that doesn’t include zero fossil-carbon emissions. The scientific consensus is that we need to reach "net zero" CO? emissions by 2050. But to tack closer to a scenario of 1.5C warming, COP24 should set this target for 2035.

Carbon removal and non-CO? emissions

The United Nations, in the IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5C has accepted that there isn’t any obvious pathway to zero emissions in such a short time frame, so they have pegged their hopes on NETs - Negative Emissions Technologies. These approaches include carbon capture and storage (CCS), which involves sucking CO? from the air and storing it deep underground.

Carbon removal along these lines is the second imperative for COP24 in Katowice. Globally we emit around 40 billion tonnes of CO? annually , so net zero CO? by 2050 will require CO? removal of this scale, starting immediately.

Read more: Explainer: what is carbon capture and storage?

But CO? isn’t the only problem. We emit other greenhouse gases such as methane, nitrous oxide and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) which all contribute to climate change. Methane is on the rise and is 84 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than CO’.

It comes from cows, and it leaks from oil wells and coal mines as " fugitive methane ". It is also seeping out of the melting permafrost in the Arctic. This is a worrying form of "positive feedback" where global warming causes the further release of gases that cause further warming.

Nitrous Oxide, which is 300 times more potent than CO’, is rising too , caused by modern agriculture. And the concentration of refrigerant gases, such as CFCs, which are thousands of times more potent than CO’, is not falling as fast as we’d hoped. So COP24 has a third imperative, to prevent the rise of non-CO? greenhouse gases. If we can stabilise non-CO? greenhouse emissions at present-day levels we’ll be doing well, but concentrations are rising fast.

Desperate times, desperate measures

All of this is going to be hard work. We’re failing to cut down our emissions, the technologies for NETs don’t exist at any meaningful scale, yet and there are no political drivers in place to enforce their deployment. There is also a real risk of a dramatic rise in methane in the near future. COP24 will have to consider emergency plans.

One such plan is very controversial. There are so-called "geoengineering" technologies which can be used to cause changes in global temperatures. One of these is Solar Radiation Management (SRM), which involves injecting tiny aerosol particles high in the atmosphere where they reflect sunlight into space.

We know from the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in 1991 that stratospheric aerosols caused a cooling of around 1C over a year. The northern winter of 1992 saw a dramatic increase in sea ice and a stalling of glacial melting. SRM technologies exist and the first sun-dimming experiments are underway.

There is a realistic possibility that deploying SRM can buy us some time to enact the essential measures needed to stop warming at or before 1.5C. The discussions at COP24 must keep all options on the table, and as unpalatable as geoengineering technologies might seem, their deployment may prove to be unavoidable.

The indicators are all in the danger zone. We are seeing increasing Arctic temperatures , rapid loss of Arctic sea ice , reduced Arctic reflectivity , rapidly melting ice shelves and methane release from permafrost. These are leading to rapidly rising sea levels , coastal flooding and storm surges , increased hurricane and storm activity , dry and hot conditions conducive to wildfires , and drought and crop failure.

The urgency for decisive action is the imperative for COP24. The UN must press on with four major strands for meeting the Paris 1.5C target:



  • Reduce fossil carbon emissions.



  • Remove carbon from the atmosphere (NETs).



  • Halt the rise of emissions of non-CO? greenhouses cases (Methane, Nitrous oxide, CFCs).



  • Investigate techniques for geoengineering, including Solar Radiation Management.



  • All four of these must proceed simultaneously and in parallel. COP24 must make this perfectly clear. There is utmost urgency and no time to "wait and see".

    Hugh Hunt , Reader in Engineering Dynamics and Vibration, University of Cambridge

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    The termly Research Horizons email lets you know when the latest issue of the University of Cambridge’s research magazine is available to read online. Enter your name and email address below and select ’Subscribe’ to sign up.

    The University of Cambridge will use your name and email address to send you our termly Research Horizons email. We are committed to protecting your personal information and being transparent about what information we hold. Please read our email privacy notice for details.