- Social Sciences - May 22 Comment: The dark night of the polls: How did the polls get the 2015 election so wrong?
- Law - May 22 Human Rights in the United Kingdom: Where Now?
- Administration - May 22 Why some women pay for sex
- Administration - May 22 Study examines increase in calls to emergency services
- Life Sciences - May 22 Herpes virus hijackers
- Social Sciences - May 22 Understanding the ancient world through language
- Administration - May 22 Sussex economist to write innovation policy report for Brazilian government
- Literature - May 21 Voting opens for Oxford University’s next Professor of Poetry
- Life Sciences - May 21 Exhibition puts natural world under the scientific lens
- Astronomy - May 21 Sudden onset of ice loss in Antarctica detected
- Social Sciences - May 21 Midlands people can help design future of our home heating & hot water systems
- Study of Religions - May 21 Politics manipulates a culture of optimism
People forage for memories in the same way birds forage for berries
Humans move between ‘patches’ in their memory using the same strategy as bees flitting between flowers for pollen or birds searching among bushes for berries.
Researchers at the University of Warwick and Indiana University have identified parallels between animals looking for food in the wild and humans searching for items within their memory – suggesting that people with the best ‘memory foraging’ strategies are better at recalling items.
Scientists asked people to name as many animals as they could in three minutes and then compared the results with a classic model of optimal foraging in the real world, the marginal value theorem, which predicts how long animals will stay in one patch before jumping to another.
Thomas Hills, associate professor in the psychology department at the University of Warwick, said: “ A bird’s food tends to be clumped together in a specific patch – for example on a bush laden with berries.
“But when the berries on a bush are depleted to the point where the bird’s energy is best focused on another more fruitful bush, it will move on.
“This kind of behaviour is predicted by the marginal value theorem, for a wide variety of animals.
“Because of the way human attention has evolved, we wondered if humans might use the same strategies to forage in memory. It turns out, they do.
“When faced with a memory task, we focus on specific clusters of information and jump between them like a bird between bushes. For example, when hunting for animals in memory, most people start with a patch of household pets—like dog, cat and hamster.
“But then as this patch becomes depleted, they look elsewhere. They might then alight on another semantically distinct ‘patch’, for example predatory animals such as lion, tiger and jaguar.”
The study shows that people who either stay too long or not long enough in one ‘patch’ did not recall as many animals as those who better judged the best time to switch between patches.
In other words, people who most closely adhered to the marginal value theorem produced more items.
The study Optimal Foraging in Semantic Memory, published in Psychological Review, asked 141 undergraduates (46 men and 95 women) at Indiana University to name as many animals as they could in three minutes.
They then analysed the responses using a categorisation scheme and also a semantic space model, called BEAGLE, which identifies clusters in the memory landscape based on the way words are related to one another in natural language.
Last job offers
- Medicine/Pharmacology - 22.5
- Media Sciences - 21.5
Assistant Professor in Politics & IR
- History/Archeology - 20.5
Chair in British and American Art post 1800 - 51487
- Pedagogy/Education Science - 19.5
Lecturer or Associate Professor in Education or Childhood Studies
- Pedagogy/Education Science - 19.5
Professor / Reader of Soil Science
- Earth Sciences - 19.5
Professor or Reader of Atmospheric Informatics
- Business/Economics - 19.5
Lecturer (Assistant Professor)/Senior Lecturer (Associate Professor) in Applied Environmental Economics...
- Literature/Linguistics - 18.5
Assistant Professor in Modern and Contemporary Poetry