- Psychology - 10:00 Play’s the thing
- Pedagogy - Aug 3 Comment: Want to raise the quality of teaching? Begin with academic freedom
- Philosophy - Aug 3 Comment: It’s important to understand why some people support capital punishment
- Microtechnics - Aug 3 Graphene drives potential for the next- generation of fuel- efficient cars
- Arts - Aug 3 Key role for campus in piano contest’s art installation
- Mechanical Engineering - Aug 3 Engineering graduate helps re-fire century- old coffee roaster
- Medicine - Aug 3 New Associate Dean of Social and Clinical Medicine
- Business - Aug 3 Multi- platform media and the digital challenge - an analysis
- Computer Science - Aug 3 University launches ’National Software Academy’
- Medicine - Aug 3 Childhood cancer cells drain immune system’s batteries
- Administration - Aug 3 Welsh language media in spotlight
- Earth Sciences - Jul 31 The Magna Carta of scientific maps
Foundations were major force behind US rise as a superpower
A 15-year study of Rockefeller, Ford and Carnegie foundations has shown how they made powerful contributions to America’s rising fortunes as an international powerhouse.
Professor Inderjeet Parmar from The University of Manchester says the organisations have a century-long history of political activity, with connections all the way up to the US State Department, CIA and National Security Council.
He said: “Although today they do contribute to society in positive ways, the Rockefeller, Ford and Carnegie Foundations’ own records show that beneath a glossy, liberal, philanthropic exterior, they sometimes had sinister side.
“This should not really be so surprising when we consider their founders and origins - steeped in the rise of US corporate capitalism, violent anti-unionism, and political corruption, particularly in the late 1890s and early 1900s.
“Their original founders were industrialists and manufacturers, linked to big banks and finance houses like JP Morgan and Standard Oil.
“Their boards of trustees were, and are, normally drawn from a relatively narrow section of society – lawyers, elite university administrators and presidents, corporate executives, press magnates, former public officials.”
According to Professor Parmar, though US foundations have continued to affect US foreign policy and development of globalisation since the end of the Cold War.
Foundation networks have been central, he says, in elevating and refining what has become the central rationale of US national security strategy since the collapse of the Soviet union.
He said: “Although globalisation appears to have broadened the recruitment of trustees – there are now more women, people of colour, and foreign nationals – they remain elitist, technocratic and top-down, pro-American organisations.”
Last job offers
- Physics/Materials Science - 3.8
Professor / Reader in Novel Methods of Particle Acceleration
- Life Sciences - 3.8
Professorship of Immunology
- Mechanical Engineering - 31.7
Assistant Professor in Materials
- Pedagogy/Education Science - 30.7
Lecturer or Associate Professor in Film and Media
- Social Sciences - 29.7
Chair of Sociology and/or Criminology
- Social Sciences - 29.7
Chair in Sociology / Science and Technology Studies
- - 29.7
FETL Professor of Leadership in Further Education and Skills
- Medicine/Pharmacology - 29.7
Associate Professor in Adult Nursing